Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
This paper assesses social science research relating to BECCS and considers the applicability of research on CCS to BECCS.
Recent Findings
In recent years, social science research on CCS and BECCS has gone beyond an evaluation of public acceptance to provide a more nuanced analysis of the wider social political, ethical, and governance contexts in which large-scale deployment might be achieved. This raises issues at global, local, and regional scales, requiring a wide array of methods and approaches.
Summary
Awareness of the scale and urgency needed to act on climate change is growing and the role of BECCS in delivering carbon dioxide removal forms a central argument for the use of this family of technologies. Here, framing becomes a critical factor in how society responds to BECCS technologies and we argue that making the case for BECCS as a means of extending mitigation to make a ‘net zero’ goal achievable could be the key to its acceptable and sustainable deployment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. GCCSI. Global status report. Gobal CCS Insitute; 2018.
2. Gough C, Taylor I, Shackley S. Burying carbon under the sea: an initial exploration of public opinions. Energy Environ. 2002;13:883–900.
3. Lenstra WJ, Engelenburg BCW, editors. Climate policy, CO2 storage and public perception. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Cairns, Autrsalia: CSIRO Publishing; 2001
4. L’Orange Seigo S, Dohle S, Siegrist M. Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;38(0):848–63.
5. Jones CR, Olfe-Kräutlein B, Naims H, Armstrong K. The social acceptance of carbon dioxide utilisation: a review and research agenda. Front Energy Res. 2017;5(11).
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献