Author:
Arel Barbara,Beaudoin Cathy A.,Cianci Anna M.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference66 articles.
1. Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik, T. S., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 747–767.
2. Ahlawat, S. S., & Lowe, D. J. (2004). An examination of internal auditor objectivity: In-house versus outsourcing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 147–158.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1997). The auditors’ consideration of the internal audit function in an audit of financial statements. Statement on auditing standards no. 65. http://www.aicpa.org/download/members/div/auditstd/AUD-00322.PDF .
4. Asare, S. K., Davidson, R. A., & Gramling, A. A. (2008). Internal auditors’ evaluation of fraud factors in planning an audit: The importance of audit committee quality and management incentives. International Journal of Auditing, 12(3), 181–203.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献