Abstract
AbstractThe normalized eight-point algorithm has been widely viewed as the cornerstone in two-view geometry computation, where the seminal Hartley’s normalization has greatly improved the performance of the direct linear transformation algorithm. A natural question is, whether there are and how to find other normalization methods that can further improve the performance for each input sample. In this paper, we provide a novel perspective and propose two contributions to this fundamental problem: (1) we revisit the normalized eight-point algorithm and make a theoretical contribution by presenting the existence of different and better normalization algorithms; (2) we introduce a deep convolutional neural network with a self-supervised learning strategy for normalization. Given eight pairs of correspondences, our network directly predicts the normalization matrices, thus learning to normalize each input sample. Our learning-based normalization module can be integrated with both traditional (e.g., RANSAC) and deep learning frameworks (affording good interpretability) with minimal effort. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real images demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
National Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1981). A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature, 293(5828), 133–135.
2. Hartley, R. (1997). In defense of the eight-point algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(6), 580–593.
3. Dai, Y., Li, H., & Kneip, L. (2016). Rolling shutter camera relative pose: Generalized epipolar geometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 4132–4140). Piscataway: IEEE.
4. Zhao, C., Fan, B., Hu, J., Pan, Q., & Xu, Z. (2021). Homography-based camera pose estimation with known gravity direction for UAV navigation. Science China. Information Sciences, 64(1), 1–13.
5. Szpak, Z. L., Chojnacki, W., & van den Hengel, A. (2015). Guaranteed ellipse fitting with a confidence region and an uncertainty measure for centre, axes, and orientation. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 52(2), 173–199.