Abstract
AbstractExtreme poverty is a complex and multifaceted challenge that cannot be solely addressed through economic interventions. Traditional economic indicators, such as GDP, do not fully capture the realities of vulnerable populations who often experience discrimination and social exclusion. This has legal and human rights implications, particularly in regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa where extreme poverty is concentrated. In light of these concerns, this article critically examines the existing literature on poverty economics and law and presents an analysis of key data. Ultimately, the article argues for a comprehensive approach that prioritises law and justice as crucial components of efforts to achieve target 1 of the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. This approach should entail the establishment of legal frameworks that promote accountability for political actors and protect the rights of the poor.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference70 articles.
1. Aayog, N. (2022). Poverty rate in India statistics 2022. The Global Statistics. https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/poverty-in-india-statistics-2021/#:~:text=According%20to%20Niti%20Aayog%2C%2025,of%20India%20is%20in%20poverty
2. Abulencia, C. (2022, March 1). 10 major causes of poverty and how we can solve them. World Vision. https://www.worldvision.ca/stories/child-sponsorship/major-causes-of-poverty
3. Ali, A. G., & Thorbecke, E. (2000). The state and path of poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Some preliminary results. Journal of African Economies, 9(1), 9–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jafeco/9.Supplement_1.9
4. Arimoro, A. (2019a). Public-private partnership and the right to property in Nigeria. African Human Rights Law Journal, 19(2), 763–778. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n2a10
5. Arimoro, A. E. (2019b). Are they not Nigerians? The obligation of the state to end discriminatory practices against persons with disabilities. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 19(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229119846764