Abstract
With his systematic review and methodical discussion of other scholars’ works, Godelier constructed a theory of Marxism that “made sense” in the empirical worlds of anthropology, while preserving the main tenets of historical materialism and dialectical materialism. From his writings in the 1970s, his workshops on “transition,” and his seminars at the CNRS in the early 1980s, we learned to think theoretically about our ethnographic material, and to do it within a framework that referred to Marx. For us, on the one hand, Godelier provided a Marxist theory that respected the value of concrete ethnography, and on the other hand, explored the issue of transitions from one system to another, while thinking about the future, a passage to a better system, probably socialist.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology
Reference31 articles.
1. Althusser, Louis, and Balibar Etienne. 1968. Lire le Capital (2 volumes). Petite collection Maspero, N° 30 et 31. Paris: François Maspero. A first complete edition was published in 1965.
2. Althusser, Louis. 1974 [1965]. Pour Marx. Paris: François Maspero.
3. Bert, Jean-François. 2007. Entretien avec Maurice Godelier. Le Portique [En ligne], 19 | 2007. https://journals.openedition.org/leportique/1261.
4. Bohannan, Paul. 1959. The Impact of Money on an African Subsistence Economy. The Journal of Economic History 19 (4): 491–503.
5. Bouche, Denise. 1987. Alain Ruscio, Les communistes français et la guerre d'Indochine, 1944-1954. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 34 (4): 700–702.