Abstract
AbstractWorks of art are usually meant to elicit psychological effects from their audiences whereas paradigmatic technical artifacts such as hammers or cars are rather meant to produce physical effects when used. This suggests that works of art and technical artifacts are sharply different entities. However, recent developments in the cognitive sciences and the philosophy of technology have individuated special artifacts, namely cognitive and affective artifacts, which also generate psychological effects. In particular, affective artifacts, which have the capacity to alter the affective condition of agents, seem to share crucial features with works of art. Can we subsume works of art under that kind? I will argue that we cannot. Still, comparing art with affective artifacts will help us to clarify the relationship between art and technology, and to introduce a new category, namely the experiential artifact, which can properly encompass works of art.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Università degli Studi di Genova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. Abell C (2012) Art: what it is and why it matters. Philos Phenomenol Res 85(3):671–691
2. Adorno TW (1970) Ästhetische theorie. English translation by R. Hullot-Kentor: Aesthetic theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
3. Batteux C (1746) Les beaux arts réduits à un même principe. Durand, Paris
4. Beardsley M (1983) An aesthetic definition of art. In: Curtler H (ed) What Is Art? Haven, New York
5. Benjamin W (1936) Das kunstwerk im zeitalter seiner technischen reproduzierbakeit. Suhrkamp Verlag, In Schriften. Frankfurt am Main
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献