Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Data: When is Statistical Evidence Too Good to be True?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Data: When is Statistical Evidence Too Good to be True?

Published:2014-02-16 Issue:2 Volume:33 Page:323-337
ISSN:0167-7411
Container-title:Topoi
language:en
Short-container-title:Topoi

Author:

MacDougall Margaret

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11245-013-9216-5.pdf

Reference44 articles.

1. Abelson RP (1995) Statistics as principled argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

2. Acuña E and Rodriguez C (2004) A Meta analysis study of outlier detection methods in classification. Paper presented at the IPSI 2004, Venice, Italy. http://academic.uprm.edu/eacuna/paperout.pdf

3. Akhtar-Danesh N, Dehghan-Kooshkghazi M (1993) How does correlation structure differ between real and fabricated data-sets? BMC Med Res Methodol 3(18):18

4. Allnark P (2001) Is it in a neonate’s best interest to enter a randomised controlled trial? J Med Ethics 27(2):110–113

5. Al-Marzouki S, Evans S, Marshall T, Roberts I (2005) Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials. Br Med J 331:268–270

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Likelihood Ratio Test and the Evidential Approach for 2 × 2 Tables;Entropy;2024-04-28

2. RCTs from Within: The Influence of Scientific Rigour, Randomisation and Chance on the Credibility of Reported Findings;A Medical Educator's Guide to Thinking Critically about Randomised Controlled Trials: Deconstructing the "Gold Standard";2024