Author:
McNelly Megan,Choi Jun-Ki
Abstract
AbstractEnergy audits directly provided the industrial sector with reduced energy costs and avoided emissions. Still, they also lead to far-reaching indirect and induced local, regional, and national benefits. This paper aims to present the techno-economic-environmental analysis to achieve decarbonization through implementing industrial energy efficiency at micro and macro levels. An integrated techno-economic-environmental methodology is developed. Case studies of micro-level carbon reduction efforts through industrial energy efficiency technologies are presented. The broader macroeconomic and environmental effects of technology on society are analyzed using data from 206 energy audits of industrial compressed air systems conducted over 13 years. The impacts show that energy-efficient improvements lead to direct cost savings for manufacturers, boost economic activity across sectors, and affect carbon dioxide emissions both short-term and long-term in the region. Given their extensive benefits, energy audits significantly influence policymaking. We devised a methodology to link micro-level energy audit data with macroeconomic and environmental analyses to quantify these cascading benefits. The economic scenario analysis shows that $228 M has been saved from direct industrial energy savings from implementing all compressed air recommendations in the studied periods and the region. In addition, the investment made through manufacturers would create 2,025 jobs and $383 M annually, cascading regional economic impacts. The environmental analysis shows that the regional manufacturers have directly avoided about 2.8 M metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
Funder
Advanced Manufacturing Office
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Lifset, R. D. (2014). A new understanding of the American energy crisis of the 1970s. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 39(4(150)), 22–42.
2. Zhou, L., Li, J., Li, F., Meng, Q., Li, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Energy consumption model and energy efficiency of machine tools: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3721–3734.
3. May, G., Stahl, B., Taisch, M., & Kiritsis, D. (2017). Energy management in manufacturing: From literature review to a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1464–1489.
4. Choi, J.-K., & Ramani, K. (2009). A quest for sustainable product design: a systematic methodology for integrated assessment of environmentally benign and economically feasible product design. VDM Publishing.
5. Choi, J.-K., Schuessler, R., Ising, M., Kelley, D., & Kissock, K. (2018). A pathway towards sustainable manufacturing for mid-size manufacturers. Procedia CIRP, 69, 230–235.