Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to raise the question of aging as an ontological question. In critical dialogue with Heidegger’s exploration of the question of being, the first half of the paper argues that fundamental ontology, due to the way it relies on a methodological operationalization of the ontological difference, will remain blind to the ontological generativity of the differences that aging makes. I introduce the term gerontological difference as a name for this kind of difference. The second half of the paper explores the quasi-transcendental play of gerontological difference. Drawing on Foucault, Guenther and Agamben, I suggest that this play might be described in archaeological terms by tracing the historical a priori in which age distinctions are operationalized biopolitically. Drawing on Derrida and Nancy, I argue that this archaeological view of the quasi-transcendental play of gerontological difference must be supplemented with a view of aging as material différance. According to this understanding of the quasi-transcendental play of gerontological difference, aging is an ontologically generative event that organizes intercorporeal tangles of coexistence and opens emergent fields of possible experience.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The open: Man and animal. Translated by Kevin Attell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2. Agamben, Giorgio. 2009. The Signature of All Things: On Method. Translated by Luca D’Isanto and Kevin Attell. New York: Zone Books.
3. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Durham: Duke University Press.
4. Aho, Kevin. 2006. Metontology and the body-problem in being and Time. Auslegung 28: 1–20.
5. Baars, Jan. 1991. The challenge of critical gerontology: the problem of social constitution. Journal of Aging Studies 5: 219–243.