“I don’t Remember that”: Negotiating Memories and Epistemic Claims in Swedish High-Stake Police Interviews

Author:

Nyroos LinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper employs Conversation Analysis to investigate a specific interactional environment in Swedish police interviews (PIs): sequences where the interviewee asserts an inability to recollect specific events, and the police subsequently challenge this assertion. The police interview serves as a crucial setting for reconstructing past events and identifying the distribution of knowledge among participants. While previous research has delved into the cognitive mechanisms underlying memory retrieval in PIs, there exists a scarcity of empirical investigation of how memories and their associated knowledge are interactionally managed within this high-stakes activity. Prior Conversation Analytic studies exploring how epistemic dimensions shape social interaction form the theoretical basis for the current study, including research indicating how ‘forgetfulness’ can be strategically employed as an interactional resource. Only a few studies have targeted recorded high-stakes interviews in Swedish, and the lack of such is problematic since international research have highlighted the influence of cultural and social factors on conditions and outcomes. Data used for this study comprises anonymized audio recordings (N = 51) from a preliminary murder investigation, making a valuable contribution to the understanding of interactional practices in Swedish police interviews. Results indicate a discrepancy in orientation between the police and the interviewee. The former treats the memories as accessible knowables possible to retrieve, in contrast to the latter, who uses the police’s challenge as a vehicle for contesting the ‘impossible action of remembering.’

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

Södertörn University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Language and Linguistics

Reference56 articles.

1. Antaki, Charles, Emma Richardson, Elizabeth Stokoe, and Sara Willott. 2015. Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (3): 328–350.

2. Bucholtz, Mary. 2000. The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1439–1465.

3. Byrman, Ylva. 2017. Så fångas de misstänktas ord: förhör och dokumentationspraktiker på Skattebrottsenheten. Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

4. Carter, Elisabeth. 2014. When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent: Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview. Language and Law 1 (1): 122–140.

5. Cerović, Marijana. 2022. B-event statements as vehicles for two interactional practices in police interactions with suspects/witnesses. Discourse Studies 24 (1): 3–23.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3