Abstract
AbstractIn the modern digital age, companies need to be able to quickly explore the process innovation affordances of digital technologies. This includes exploration of Machine Learning (ML), which when embedded in processes can augment or automate decisions. BPM research suggests using lightweight IT (Bygstad, Journal of Information Technology, 32(2), 180–193 2017) for digital process innovation, but existing research provides conflicting views on whether ML is lightweight or heavyweight. We therefore address the research question “How can Lightweight IT contribute to explorative BPM for embedded ML?” by analyzing four action cases from a large Danish manufacturer. We contribute to explorative BPM by showing that lightweight ML considerably speeds up opportunity assessment and technical implementation in the exploration process thus reducing process innovation latency. We furthermore show that succesful lightweight ML requires the presence of two enabling factors: 1) loose coupling of the IT infrastructure, and 2) extensive use of building blocks to reduce custom development.
Funder
Manufacturing Academy of Denmark
Aalborg University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Ågerfalk, P. J. (2010). Getting pragmatic. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.22
2. Anand, A., Sharma, R., & Coltman, T. (2016). Four Steps to Realizing Business Value from Digital Data Streams. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(4). https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol15/iss4/3
3. Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. Simon and Schuster.
4. Baier, M.-S., Lockl, J., Röglinger, M., & Weidlich, R. (2022). Success factors of process digitalization projects – insights from an exploratory study. Business Process Management Journal, 28(2), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2021-0484
5. Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., & Tapanainen, T. (2020). Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007