Cross-national examination of the Distress Tolerance Scale using Rasch methodology
-
Published:2024-04-09
Issue:24
Volume:43
Page:21162-21179
-
ISSN:1046-1310
-
Container-title:Current Psychology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Curr Psychol
Author:
Oorjitham ShantiniORCID, Medvedev Oleg N., Bravo Adrian J., , Conway Christopher C., Henson James M., Hogarth Lee, Ibáñez Manuel I., Kaminer Debra, Keough Matthew, Mezquita Laura, Ortet Generós, Pearson Matthew R., Pilatti Angelina, Prince Mark A., Read Jennifer P., Roozen Hendrik G., Ruiz Paul
Abstract
AbstractThe 15-item Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS) is a widely used psychometric measure with evidence generally supporting its reliability and validity. However, limitations related to its ordinal response format and lack of cross-cultural comparisons have yet to be investigated using appropriate methods. The Partial Credit Rasch model was used to evaluate and enhance the psychometric properties of the DTS using responses from 2550 adult participants from the United States of America (USA), England, Canada, South Africa, Spain, and Argentina. The initial poor fit of the DTS to the Rasch model was improved by removing one item and combining locally dependent items into three testlets. These modifications resulted in the best fit of the 14-item DTS to the Rasch model for all the countries in our study, providing evidence of unidimensionality, high reliability and invariance across countries, meditation practice, and gender. Meeting the expectations of the Rasch model permitted the development of ordinal-to-interval conversion algorithms derived from person estimates of the Rasch model. Using the ordinal-to-interval conversion algorithms published in this article, ordinal DTS scores can be transformed into interval-level data, enhancing the precision of this scale for future research and clinical use across people from the six countries in this study and across the English and Spanish versions of the 14-item DTS.
Funder
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Universitat Jaume I Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba University of Waikato
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814 2. Andrich, D., & Marais, I. (2019). A course in Rasch measurement theory: Measuring in the educational, social and health sciences. Springer Nature Singapore Pte. Ltd. 3. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM2030. RUMM Laboratory Pte. Ltd. 4. Anestis, M. D., Lavender, J. M., Marshall-Berenz, E. C., Gratz, K., Tull, M. T., & Joiner, T. E. (2011). Evaluating distress tolerance measures: Interrelations and associations with impulsive behaviors. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(6), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9377-8 5. Anselmi, P., Colledani, D., & Robusto, E. (2019). A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714
|
|