Examining the congruence hypothesis in vocational interest research: the case of teacher students

Author:

Leichner NikolasORCID,Ottenstein Charlotte,Eckhard Jan,Matheis Svenja,Weis Susanne,Schmitt Manfred,Lischetzke Tanja

Abstract

AbstractAccording to the congruence hypothesis, job and study satisfaction will be higher when individual interests and the respective environment (both conceptualised according to Holland’s RIASEC model) are congruent. As our target group were teacher students, all participants who did not intend to become a teacher or did not meet other inclusion criteria (e.g., no missing data on relevant variables) were removed from the sample, resulting in a final sample of N = 1171. Teacher students completed questionnaires on their vocational interests and their satisfaction with course content. To obtain an assessment of the environment (study majors), N = 166 lecturers were asked to rate their courses with respect to Holland’s RIASEC model. As previous findings have indicated that conclusions are influenced by the congruence measure that is used, we applied two different approaches. First, we computed the profile correlation between the individual interest profile and the environmental profile for each individual to measure congruence. Profile correlation scores were then correlated with satisfaction with course content scores. This correlation was significant (r = .21, p < .001), offering support for the congruence hypothesis. Second, Response Surface Analysis (RSA) was used to predict satisfaction with course content scores from the individual interest and environmental assessment variables and their interaction separately for each interest dimension. Results showed that the relationships between these three constructs were complex, but evidence for the congruence hypothesis could not be found. This makes this study the first study to investigate this hypothesis using RSA methodology.

Funder

Universität Koblenz-Landau

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3