Abstract
AbstractLiterature has shown that hospitalized women with high-risk pregnancy tend to develop anxious and depressive symptoms. Research has used quantitative or qualitative methods. By integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study aims to analyze: a) the level of depression, anxiety, and pregnancy-related anxiety in a group of women hospitalized with high-risk pregnancy (hospitalized high-risk) compared with a group of non-hospitalized women with low-risk pregnancy; b) the content of hospitalization-related emotions in a high-risk group. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 hospitalized high-risk pregnant women and 32 women with low-risk pregnancy. Participants completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Anxiety), and Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire. The hospitalized high-risk group also completed open-ended questions about emotions experienced during hospitalization. Univariate Analysis of Covariance showed that the hospitalized high-risk group reported higher general anxiety and depression than the low-risk pregnancy group. Low-risk group reported higher level of concerns about own appearance than high-risk group. Narratives showed that the anxious and depressive symptoms of hospitalized women are related to the loneliness of being away from family. Despite attempts to understand hospitalization, they express concerns about pregnancy. Psychological support for hospitalized pregnant women should be provided to facilitate the communication of emotions that leads women to elaborate the experience of hospitalization to better adapt and cope with the critical condition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Barbaranelli, C. (2007). Analisi dei dati: tecniche multivariate per la ricerca psicologica e sociale. Edizioni universitarie di lettere economia diritto.
2. Barber, C. C., & Starkey, N. (2015). Predictors of anxiety among pregnant New Zealand women hospitalized for complications and a community comparison group. Midwifery, 31(9), 888–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.017.
3. Bateman, B. T., Mhyre, J. M., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Huybrechts, K. F., Fischer, M. A., Creanga, A. A., Callaghan, W. M., & Gagne, J. J. (2013). Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122, 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a603bb.
4. Behrman, R. E., Butler A. S. (Eds.) (2007). Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention, National Academies Press.
5. Benvenuti, P., Ferrara, M., Niccolai, C., Valoriani, V., & Cox, J. L. (1999). The Edimburgh postnatal depression scale: Validation for an Italian sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 53(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00102-5.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献