Abstract
AbstractBuilding on a wealth of studies on the strengths and pitfalls of EU harmonisation in the field of copyright exceptions and limitations, and on the state of the art of the copyright balance across the Union, the H2020 project reCreating Europe performed an unprecedented comparative mapping of EU and national legislative acts and case law regulating copyright “flexibilities” (exceptions and limitations; definition of protectable subject-matter; terms of protection; exhaustion; judicial doctrines such as fair balance and the horizontal effects of fundamental rights on copyright law; statutory licensing schemes; paying public domain et al.). On this basis, it produced national and comparative reports, grouped into 12 homogeneous categories of permitted uses. The study aimed at (a) assessing the degree of harmonisation across the EU and the impact of their territoriality and optional nature on the proper functioning of the system; (b) mapping which “uses” and “purposes” are balanced against copyright and with what results, both in the EU and in each Member State; and (c) identifying the regulatory gaps and enablers impacting on the proper functioning of copyright flexibilities across the Union. This article will provide an overview of the background, methodology (Section 2) and main results of the research, sketching the past and present of EU copyright flexibilities (Section 3). On this basis, it will provide general and specific recommendations for future reforms (Section 4).
Funder
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference107 articles.
1. Angelopoulos C (2022) Study on EU copyright and related rights and access to and reuse of scientific publications, including open access: exceptions and limitations, rights retention strategy and the secondary publication right. Study for the European Commission, pp 1–76
2. Aplin T, Bently L (2020) Global mandatory fair use. The nature and scope of the right to quote copyright works. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Aplin T, Bently L (2021) Displacing the dominance of the three-step test: the role of global mandatory fair use. In: Sun H, Balganesh T (eds) The Cambridge handbook of copyright exceptions and limitations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 37–59
4. Balganesh S, Wee Loon NL, Sun H (2021) The Cambridge handbook of copyright limitations and exceptions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Borghi M (2021) Exceptions as users’ rights. In: Rosati E (ed) The Routledge handbook of EU copyright law. Routledge, London, pp 263–279
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Knock, Knock, Knockin’ on Tranformativeness’ Doors;IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law;2024-03-28
2. Territoriality and the Quest for a Unitary Copyright Title;IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law;2024-01