The Past, Present and Future of EU Copyright Flexibilities

Author:

Sganga Caterina

Abstract

AbstractBuilding on a wealth of studies on the strengths and pitfalls of EU harmonisation in the field of copyright exceptions and limitations, and on the state of the art of the copyright balance across the Union, the H2020 project reCreating Europe performed an unprecedented comparative mapping of EU and national legislative acts and case law regulating copyright “flexibilities” (exceptions and limitations; definition of protectable subject-matter; terms of protection; exhaustion; judicial doctrines such as fair balance and the horizontal effects of fundamental rights on copyright law; statutory licensing schemes; paying public domain et al.). On this basis, it produced national and comparative reports, grouped into 12 homogeneous categories of permitted uses. The study aimed at (a) assessing the degree of harmonisation across the EU and the impact of their territoriality and optional nature on the proper functioning of the system; (b) mapping which “uses” and “purposes” are balanced against copyright and with what results, both in the EU and in each Member State; and (c) identifying the regulatory gaps and enablers impacting on the proper functioning of copyright flexibilities across the Union. This article will provide an overview of the background, methodology (Section 2) and main results of the research, sketching the past and present of EU copyright flexibilities (Section 3). On this basis, it will provide general and specific recommendations for future reforms (Section 4).

Funder

Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference107 articles.

1. Angelopoulos C (2022) Study on EU copyright and related rights and access to and reuse of scientific publications, including open access: exceptions and limitations, rights retention strategy and the secondary publication right. Study for the European Commission, pp 1–76

2. Aplin T, Bently L (2020) Global mandatory fair use. The nature and scope of the right to quote copyright works. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

3. Aplin T, Bently L (2021) Displacing the dominance of the three-step test: the role of global mandatory fair use. In: Sun H, Balganesh T (eds) The Cambridge handbook of copyright exceptions and limitations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 37–59

4. Balganesh S, Wee Loon NL, Sun H (2021) The Cambridge handbook of copyright limitations and exceptions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

5. Borghi M (2021) Exceptions as users’ rights. In: Rosati E (ed) The Routledge handbook of EU copyright law. Routledge, London, pp 263–279

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Knock, Knock, Knockin’ on Tranformativeness’ Doors;IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law;2024-03-28

2. Territoriality and the Quest for a Unitary Copyright Title;IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3