Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI

Author:

Russo FedericaORCID,Schliesser Eric,Wagemans JeanORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe need for fair and just AI is often related to the possibility of understanding AI itself, in other words, of turning an opaque box into a glass box, as inspectable as possible. Transparency and explainability, however, pertain to the technical domain and to philosophy of science, thus leaving the ethics and epistemology of AI largely disconnected. To remedy this, we propose an integrated approach premised on the idea that a glass-box epistemology should explicitly consider how to incorporate values and other normative considerations, such as intersectoral vulnerabilities, at critical stages of the whole process from design and implementation to use and assessment. To connect ethics and epistemology of AI, we perform a double shift of focus. First, we move from trusting the output of an AI system to trusting the process that leads to the outcome. Second, we move from expert assessment to more inclusive assessment strategies, aiming to facilitate expert and non-expert assessment. Together, these two moves yield a framework usable for experts and non-experts when they inquire into relevant epistemological and ethical aspects of AI systems. We dub our framework ‘epistemology-cum-ethics’ to signal the equal importance of both aspects. We develop it from the vantage point of the designers: how to create the conditions to internalize values into the whole process of design, implementation, use, and assessment of an AI system, in which values (epistemic and non-epistemic) are explicitly considered at each stage and inspectable by every salient actor involved at any moment.

Funder

Universiteit van Amsterdam

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference84 articles.

1. AI HLEG (2018) A definition of AI: main capabilities and scientific disciplines. European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2023

2. AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2023

3. Ananny M, Crawford K (2018) Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc 20(3):973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645

4. Anderson E (2020) Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2020 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/. Accessed 6 Jan 2023

5. Barry BE, Herkert JR (2014) Engineering ethics. In: Johri A, Olds BM (eds) Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.041

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3