Abstract
AbstractThe need for fair and just AI is often related to the possibility of understanding AI itself, in other words, of turning an opaque box into a glass box, as inspectable as possible. Transparency and explainability, however, pertain to the technical domain and to philosophy of science, thus leaving the ethics and epistemology of AI largely disconnected. To remedy this, we propose an integrated approach premised on the idea that a glass-box epistemology should explicitly consider how to incorporate values and other normative considerations, such as intersectoral vulnerabilities, at critical stages of the whole process from design and implementation to use and assessment. To connect ethics and epistemology of AI, we perform a double shift of focus. First, we move from trusting the output of an AI system to trusting the process that leads to the outcome. Second, we move from expert assessment to more inclusive assessment strategies, aiming to facilitate expert and non-expert assessment. Together, these two moves yield a framework usable for experts and non-experts when they inquire into relevant epistemological and ethical aspects of AI systems. We dub our framework ‘epistemology-cum-ethics’ to signal the equal importance of both aspects. We develop it from the vantage point of the designers: how to create the conditions to internalize values into the whole process of design, implementation, use, and assessment of an AI system, in which values (epistemic and non-epistemic) are explicitly considered at each stage and inspectable by every salient actor involved at any moment.
Funder
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy
Reference84 articles.
1. AI HLEG (2018) A definition of AI: main capabilities and scientific disciplines. European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2023
2. AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html. Accessed 6 Jan 2023
3. Ananny M, Crawford K (2018) Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc 20(3):973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
4. Anderson E (2020) Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2020 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/. Accessed 6 Jan 2023
5. Barry BE, Herkert JR (2014) Engineering ethics. In: Johri A, Olds BM (eds) Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.041
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献