Abstract
AbstractThere are growing expectations in Australia and internationally that school educators will engage with and use research to improve their practice. In order to support educators to respond to such expectations, there is a need to be able to accurately assess the levels of educators’ research engagement. At present, however, few psychometrically sound instruments are available. Drawing on two studies of Australian educators (n = 1,311) and utilising Rasch analysis, supported by confirmatory factor analysis, this paper reports on the development of a brief eight-item scale that demonstrates validity and reliability and evidenced unidimensionality in the second study. The scale is intended as a quick, easy-to-use tool for educators to gain insights into their beliefs about the value of engaging with research, their actions around using research, and their confidence in finding, interpreting, and judging the quality of relevant research. Notwithstanding the need for further testing, this paper argues that the scale has the potential to be applicable to other educational contexts and to contribute to future research into educators’ research engagement and its assessment. The scale can also provide school and education system leaders, as well as evaluators and researchers, with data regarding educators’ research engagement over time, allowing for research use supports and resources to be better targeted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference86 articles.
1. Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(5), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.59
2. Andrich, D. (2016). Components of variance of scales with a bifactor subscale structure from two calculations of α. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35(4), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12132
3. Andrich, D., & Marais, I. (2019). A course in Rasch measurement theory: Measuring in the educational, social and health sciences. Springer.
4. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B. S., & Luo, G. (2013). RUMM2030: A MS Windows computer program for the analysis of data according to Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. RUMM Laboratory.
5. Bell, M., Cordingley, P., Isham, C., & Davis, R. (2010). Report of professional practitioner use of research review: Practitioner engagement in and/or with research. CUREE, GTCE, LSIS, & NTRP. http://www.curee.co.uk/node/2303
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献