School educators’ engagement with research: an Australian Rasch validation study

Author:

Gleeson JoanneORCID,Cutler BlakeORCID,Rickinson MarkORCID,Walsh LucasORCID,Ehrich JohnORCID,Cirkony ConnieORCID,Salisbury MandyORCID

Abstract

AbstractThere are growing expectations in Australia and internationally that school educators will engage with and use research to improve their practice. In order to support educators to respond to such expectations, there is a need to be able to accurately assess the levels of educators’ research engagement. At present, however, few psychometrically sound instruments are available. Drawing on two studies of Australian educators (n = 1,311) and utilising Rasch analysis, supported by confirmatory factor analysis, this paper reports on the development of a brief eight-item scale that demonstrates validity and reliability and evidenced unidimensionality in the second study. The scale is intended as a quick, easy-to-use tool for educators to gain insights into their beliefs about the value of engaging with research, their actions around using research, and their confidence in finding, interpreting, and judging the quality of relevant research. Notwithstanding the need for further testing, this paper argues that the scale has the potential to be applicable to other educational contexts and to contribute to future research into educators’ research engagement and its assessment. The scale can also provide school and education system leaders, as well as evaluators and researchers, with data regarding educators’ research engagement over time, allowing for research use supports and resources to be better targeted.

Funder

Paul Ramsay Foundation

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education

Reference86 articles.

1. Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(5), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.59

2. Andrich, D. (2016). Components of variance of scales with a bifactor subscale structure from two calculations of α. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35(4), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12132

3. Andrich, D., & Marais, I. (2019). A course in Rasch measurement theory: Measuring in the educational, social and health sciences. Springer.

4. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B. S., & Luo, G. (2013). RUMM2030: A MS Windows computer program for the analysis of data according to Rasch unidimensional models for measurement. RUMM Laboratory.

5. Bell, M., Cordingley, P., Isham, C., & Davis, R. (2010). Report of professional practitioner use of research review: Practitioner engagement in and/or with research. CUREE, GTCE, LSIS, & NTRP. http://www.curee.co.uk/node/2303

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3