Abstract
AbstractMeasuring group leadership in social networks is a nontrivial task from a methodological viewpoint. The development of modern computational methods for evaluating group leadership is rooted in the analysis of network centralities. While computational methods for assessing the centralities of individual (i.e., single) nodes in networks have been well established, the methodological apparatus for computing group centralities has been much less developed. In the research domain of quantitative methods, this situation leads to the search for interdisciplinary solutions in which game theory currently plays a dominant role. This study analyzed two computational methods to measure group leadership in networks. Both are based on the game-theoretical concept of the Shapley value (SV). Based on the illustrative networks, the given research shows and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. In short, the key finding of the study is that there is no “free lunch” method to measure group leadership, which means that each specific network requires an individual approach for choosing the most appropriate model.
Funder
Norwegian School Of Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Media Technology,Communication,Information Systems
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献