Abstract
AbstractCommunity deception is about hiding a target community that wants to remain below the radar of community detection algorithms. The goal is to devise algorithms that, given a maximum number of updates (e.g., edge additions and removal), strive to find the best way to perform such updates in order to hide the target community inside the community structure found by a detection algorithm. So far, community deception has only been studied for undirected networks, although many real-world networks (e.g., Twitter) are directed. One way to overcome this problem would be to treat the network as undirected. However, this approach discards potentially helpful information in the edge directions (e.g., A follows B does not imply that B follows A). The aim of this paper is threefold. First, to give an account of the state-of-the-art community deception techniques in undirected networks underlying their peculiarities. Second, to investigate the community deception problem in directed networks and to show how deception techniques proposed for undirected networks should be modified and adapted to work on directed networks. Third, to evaluate deception techniques both in undirected and directed networks. Our experimental evaluation on a variety of (large) directed networks shows that techniques that work well for undirected networks fail short when directly applied to directed networks, thus underlying the need for specific approaches.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Media Technology,Communication,Information Systems
Reference28 articles.
1. Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. J Stat Mech 2008(10):P10008
2. Chakraborty T, Srinivasan S, Ganguly N, Mukherjee A, Bhowmick S (2016) Permanence and community structure in complex networks. ACM TKDD 11(2):1–34
3. Danon L, Diaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A (2005) Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 1(9):P09008
4. Fionda V, Pirrò G (2018) Community deception or: how to stop fearing community detection algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(4):660–673
5. Fionda V, Pirrò G (2022) Community deception in networks: where we are and where we should go. In: Rosa Maria B, Chantal C, Hocine C, Esteban M, Rocha LM, Sales-Pardo M (eds) Complex networks & their applications X. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 144–155
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献