Abstract
AbstractThe aim of the present research was the development and validation of a selective and reliable method for the indirect and direct determination of acidic herbicide glucosides. Enzymatic deconjugation was investigated as a mild alternative to harsh alkaline hydrolysis. Various enzymatic options for deconjugation were exploited. One out of nine tested specific enzymes proved to be practical and repeatable for different matrices and concentration ranges, leading to the complete deconjugation of the glucosides. The method was validated according to the SANTE/11312/2021 guideline for cereals and oilseeds and for a rice-based infant formula. Additionally, for four acidic herbicide glucosides available on the market, a quantitative method for direct determination of the intact glucosides was optimized and validated. In both methods, the average recoveries were within 70–120%. The limits of quantification (LOQ) achieved were 10 µg kg−1 and 2.5 µg kg−1 for the intact glucosides and the free acids in cereal and oilseeds. For the rice-based infant formula, the LOQ was 1 µg kg−1 (3 µg kg−1 for dichlorprop). To confirm its applicability, the deconjugation approach was tested for fifteen samples (cereals, oilseeds, and citrus) with incurred residues. Comparisons were made between the method without deconjugation, and two methods with deconjugation, the here proposed enzymatic deconjugation and the more commonly used alkaline hydrolysis. The inclusion of enzymatic deconjugation during sample preparation led to an increase up to 2.7-fold compared to analysis without deconjugation. Enzymatic deconjugation resulted in comparable results to alkaline hydrolysis for 13 out of 15 samples.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Dutch Ministry of Agriculture
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Biochemistry,Analytical Chemistry
Reference17 articles.
1. Zhang JJ, Yang H. Metabolism and detoxification of pesticides in plants. Sci Total Environ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148034.
2. Kawahigashi H. Transgenic plants for phytoremediation of herbicides. Curr Opin Biotech. 2009;20(2):225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.01.010.
3. Regulation (EU) No. 396/2005; full text available LexUriServ.do (europa.eu) accessed 27 Jan 2023.
4. EURL-SRM -Analytical Observations Report; https://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/userfiles/file/EurlSRM/EURL-SRM_Anal_Observ_Report_hydrol_of_Esters&Conj_of_Pesticides_V2.pdf accessed 03 May 2023.
5. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 148, p 60 ff; http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Reports_1991-2006/REPORT1998.pdf accessed 31 Jan 2023.