Revision total knee arthroplasty results in financial deficits within the Swiss healthcare system

Abstract

AbstractPurposeRevision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) results in high costs with inadequately low reimbursement in different healthcare systems. Therefore, a financial analysis was performed comparing costs and reimbursements of primary total knee arthroplasty (PTKA) versus RTKA using financial and total knee arthroplasty‐register data from a large tertiary hospital, the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen (KSSG), Switzerland.MethodsAll PTKA and RTKA performed between January 2012 and September 2019 at the KSSG were included. Financial and TKA‐register data for each case were collected, including detailed cost allocation, reimbursement, patients’ insurance status, type and indication for surgery and length of hospital stay. RTKA was further subdivided in one‐stage and two‐stage RTKA. Direct hospital costs were analyzed and compared to reimbursement in both groups. Cost‐coverage ratios were calculated.Results730 PTKA and 106 RTKA were included. The RTKA group contained 66 one‐stage and 40 two‐stage RTKA. Cost‐coverage ratio for PTKA and RTKA showed to be 110.9% and 81.3%, respectively. Cost‐coverage ratio was lower for two‐stage RTKA than for one‐stage RTKA with 74.1% and 92.3%, respectively.ConclusionRTKA leads to financial deficits especially for tertiary hospitals within the Swiss healthcare system. Restructuring of the reimbursements for PTKA and RTKA should be considered in favor of RTKA. Otherwise, tertiary hospitals will face a growing financial burden with the constantly increasing annual number of RTKA procedures, predominantly performed in this type of hospitals.Level of evidenceIII.