Abstract
AbstractStudies of stream ecosystem metabolism over decades are rare and focused on responses to a single factor, e.g., nutrient reduction or storms. Numerous studies document that light, temperature, allochthonous inputs, nutrients, and flow affect metabolism. We use measurements spanning ~ 40 years to examine the interplay of all these influences on metabolism in forested and meadow reaches of a rural stream in southeastern Pennsylvania, USA. Measurements made in 1971–1975 used benthic substrata transferred to chambers (Period 1, P1), and ones in 1997–2010 used open system methodology (P2). Metabolism was greater in the Meadow reach both periods. Gross primary productivity (GPP) was driven primarily by light and chlorophyll, and respiration (R) by temperature and inclusion of hyporheic metabolism. Annually, processes were nearly balanced (Forested reach) or dominated by autotrophy (Meadow reach) in P1. Heterotrophy predominated in both reaches in P2, fueled by litter inputs (Forested reach) and fine particulate organic matter from the agricultural watershed (Meadow reach). Storms reduced GPP, R, and chlorophyll in proportion to storm size, but had less influence than other environmental factors. Riparian-zone reforestation of the P1 Meadow reach resulted in incident light and GPP similar to that in the permanent Forested reach within ~ 20 years.
Funder
Rockefeller Foundation
Francis Boyer Trust
National Science Foundation and EPA
National Science Foundation
Pennswood 2 Endowment of the Stroud Water Research Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference105 articles.
1. Acuña, V., A. Giorgi, I. Muñoz, U. Uehlinger & S. Sabater, 2004. Flow extremes and benthic organic matter shape the metabolism of a headwater Mediterranean stream. Freshwater Biology 49: 960–971.
2. Alberts, J. M., J. J. Beaulieu & I. Buffam, 2016. Watershed land use and seasonal variation constrain the influence of riparian canopy cover on stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecosystems 20: 553–567.
3. American Public Health Association [APHA], 1971. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, New York.
4. Appling, A. P., J. S. Read, L. A. Winslow, M. Arroita, E. S. Bernhardt, N. A. Griffiths, R. O. Hall Jr., J. W. Harvey, J. B. Heffernan, E. H. Stanley, E. G. Stets & C. B. Yackulic, 2018. Data Descriptor: the metabolic regimes of 356 rivers in the United States. U. S. Geological Survey https://doi.org/10.5066/F70864KX.
5. Arcement, G. J., Jr. & V. R. Schneider, 1989. Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. USGS Water-supply Paper 2339.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献