Reach hydromorphology: a crucial environmental variable for the occurrence of riverine macrophytes
-
Published:2022-09-03
Issue:19
Volume:849
Page:4273-4285
-
ISSN:0018-8158
-
Container-title:Hydrobiologia
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrobiologia
Author:
Kaijser Willem,Hering Daniel,Lorenz Armin W.
Abstract
AbstractManagement measures targeting riverine macrophyte species often address dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus compounds. With recent reductions of nutrient pollution, effects of other variables have become more apparent. This study aims to shed light on the hierarchy of variables determining riverine macrophyte distribution, covering both surface water nutrients and a range of other variables, in a Central European landscape. We used a dataset of 1,371 monitoring samples to predict the presence and absence of 30 common macrophyte species with multiple random forest models. Besides surface water chemical variables (P-PO4, TN and pH), five reach hydromorphological variables (substrate, flow velocity, shading, width and depth) and a variable related to river size (distance from the river source) were use as predictors. The most important variables for the prediction of the species’ presence and absence were substrate, distance from the river source and flow velocity. Additionally, P-PO4 and shade were also important, whilst TN, pH, width and depth played only a minor role. River hydromorphology was more important than surface water chemistry for the occurrences of individual riverine macrophyte species, in particular under less extreme eutrophic conditions. Species occurrences were related to multiple interacting variables, amongst which hydromorphology often prevailed. Presence/absence of species and composition of assemblages cannot be attributed to surface water nutrients alone, even when considering river typologies. Therefore, the results support the conjecture that a broader approach considering a range of stressors is necessary to design restoration measures for management and enhancement of macrophyte diversity.
Funder
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Baattrup-Pedersen, A. & T. Riis, 1999. Macrophyte diversity and composition in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams. Freshwater Biology 42: 375–385. 2. Bal, K. D., T. J. Bouma, K. Buis, E. Struyf, S. Jonas, H. Backx & P. Meire, 2011. Trade-off between drag reduction and light interception of macrophytes: comparing five aquatic plants with contrasting morphology: macrophytes and drag coefficients. Functional Ecology 25: 1197–1205. 3. Barko, J. W., D. Gunnison & S. R. Carpenter, 1991. Sediment interactions with submersed macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquatic Botany 41: 41–65. 4. Biggs, B. J. F., 1996. Hydraulic habitat of plants in streams. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 131–144. 5. Birk, S., D. Chapman, L. Carvalho, B. M. Spears, H. E. Andersen, C. Argillier, S. Auer, A. Baattrup-Pedersen, L. Banin, M. Beklioğlu, E. Bondar-Kunze, A. Borja, P. Branco, T. Bucak, A. D. Buijse, A. C. Cardoso, R.-M. Couture, F. Cremona, D. de Zwart, C. K. Feld, M. T. Ferreira, H. Feuchtmayr, M. O. Gessner, A. Gieswein, L. Globevnik, D. Graeber, W. Graf, C. Gutiérrez-Cánovas, J. Hanganu, U. Işkın, M. Järvinen, E. Jeppesen, N. Kotamäki, M. Kuijper, J. U. Lemm, S. Lu, A. L. Solheim, U. Mischke, S. J. Moe, P. Nõges, T. Nõges, S. J. Ormerod, Y. Panagopoulos, G. Phillips, L. Posthuma, S. Pouso, C. Prudhomme, K. Rankinen, J. J. Rasmussen, J. Richardson, A. Sagouis, J. M. Santos, R. B. Schäfer, R. Schinegger, S. Schmutz, S. C. Schneider, L. Schülting, P. Segurado, K. Stefanidis, B. Sures, S. J. Thackeray, J. Turunen, M. C. Uyarra, M. Venohr, P. C. von der Ohe, N. Willby & D. Hering, 2020. Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4: 1060–1068.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|