Abstract
AbstractUncertainties in agriculture have been posing serious threats to organic farmers, especially the marginal ones in developing countries such as Thailand. Building resilience appears the most workable strategy to help them cope with those threats since its definitions and operation fundamentally focus upon the capacity to adapt to all types of change to be better in consequences. In this study, the author used a participatory principle and qualitative data analysis as tools. Sixty-two experienced organic farmers from four provinces in Northeastern Thailand were purposively selected as the informants. They were asked individually regarding the resilience concepts in agroecological contexts and related theories to generate a specific set of indicators whose qualities can maintain and recover organic rice production against ongoing change. Consequently, guided by three processes of qualitative study and the nominal group technique (NGT) aimed at converting abstract ideas into practical features aligned with resilience theories in agroecosystems, the organic farmers developed 28 indexes known as social-ecological resilience indicators (SERIs). The SERIs capture important components related to diversity and resource accessibility, such as ownership of legal credit sources and types of organic certification, to enhance adaptive capacity. The SERIs can serve as both quantifiable evaluation and qualitative guidance because the informants’ social, ecological, and cultural contexts are integrated. The SERIs are effective to provide empirical insights into practices and assets for building resilience. The SERIs are also vital to propose policies to encourage organic farmers to conduct adaptations and transformation during a period of change.
Funder
Khon Kaen University
National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference67 articles.
1. Abuhamda E, Ismail I, Bsharat T (2021) Understanding quantitative and qualitative research methods: a theoretical perspective for young researchers. Int J Res 8:71–87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191
2. ACT (2020) The list of organic operators. Agriculture Certification Thailand (ACT). https://www.pier.or.th/wpcontent/uploads/2019/12/pier_dp_122.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2022
3. Arunrat N, Pumijumnong N (2015) Assessment of vulnerability to food security of farmers in Sisaket Province, Thailand. J Int Acad Res Multidiscip 1625:2320–5083
4. Ashkenazy A, Chebach TC, Knickel K, Peter S, Horowitz B, Offenbach R (2018) Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions–findings from fourteen case studies. J Rural Stud 59:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.008
5. Baker C, Phongpaichit P (2014) A history of Thailand. S Printers Pte, C.O
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献