Abstract
AbstractAs social media become a staple for knowledge discovery and sharing, questions arise about how self-organizing communities manage learning outside the domain of organized, authority-led institutions. Yet examination of such communities is challenged by the quantity of posts and variety of media now used for learning. This paper addresses the challenges of identifying (1) what information, communication, and discursive practices support successful online communities, (2) whether such practices are similar on Twitter and Reddit, and (3) whether machine learning classifiers can be successfully used to analyze larger datasets of learning exchanges. This paper builds on earlier work that used manual coding of learning and exchange in Reddit ‘Ask’ communities to derive a coding schema we refer to as ‘learning in the wild’. This schema of eight categories: explanation with disagreement, agreement, or neutral presentation; socializing with negative, or positive intent; information seeking; providing resources; and comments about forum rules and norms. To compare across media, results from coding Reddit’s AskHistorians are compared to results from coding a sample of #Twitterstorians tweets (n = 594). High agreement between coders affirmed the applicability of the coding schema to this different medium. LIWC lexicon-based text analysis was used to build machine learning classifiers and apply these to code a larger dataset of tweets (n = 69,101). This research shows that the ‘learning in the wild’ coding schema holds across at least two different platforms, and is partially scalable to study larger online learning communities.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Abaho, Michael, Daniel Gartner, Federico Ceruti, John Boulton (2018). Text Annotation using Textual Semantic Similarity and Term-Frequency (Twitter). In P. Bednar; U. Frank; and K. Kautz (eds): ESCIS2018. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems, Portsmouth, UK, 23–28 June 2018. AIS Electronic Library: Association for Information Systems, https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2018_rp/205.
2. Abbar, Sofiane; Yelena Mejova; and Ingmar Weber (2015). You Tweet What You Eat: Studying Food Consumption Through Twitter. In B. Begole; J. Kim; K. Inkpen; and W. Woo (eds): CHI’15. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18 –23 April, 2015. New York: ACM Press, pp. 3197–3206.
3. Anderson, Terry, Liam Rourke, D. Randy Garrison, Walter Archer (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Online Learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–17, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875.
4. Andrews, Richard (2009). Argumentation in Higher Education. London: Taylor & Francis.
5. Andrews, Richard; and Caroline Haythornthwaite (2007). The SAGE Handbook of E-learning Research. London: SAGE.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献