Research Characteristics and Approaches Taken to Follow up with Students Exposed to Bullying: A Scoping Review
-
Published:2024-06-11
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2523-3653
-
Container-title:International Journal of Bullying Prevention
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int Journal of Bullying Prevention
Author:
Moi Anna LangeORCID, Fandrem Hildegunn, Næss Kari-Anne Bottegård, Finne Johannes Nilsson
Abstract
AbstractThis scoping review enhances the understanding of follow-up actions taken to reduce consequences from bullying, in terms of both what such actions currently entail and what they can or should encompass. Based on a comprehensive literature search of six databases, the review examines 20 peer-reviewed articles. The results highlight that there has been little empirical research on follow-up actions towards students exposed to bullying, but the existing research has been conducted worldwide and at different educational levels. When synthesized, follow-up work is not a unified concept within the literature. The examined studies were predominantly quantitative and experimental, using richly diverse measurements primarily assessing different mental health outcomes through self-report questionnaires. No common timepoint for initiate follow-up actions was shared amongst the authors. The most commonly used approach within follow-up work was to offer psychosocial support to reduce the impact of bullying on students. Less attention has been given to systemic work, particularly in the classroom environment, and to studies combining systemic and individual support. Thus, this overview contributes to the knowledge on how follow-up actions are understood and used in research and identifies important areas of focus for further research aiming to prevent prolonged consequences from bullying.
Funder
University of Stavanger & Stavanger University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 2. *Berry, K., & Hunt, C. J. (2009). Evaluation of an intervention program for anxious adolescent boys who are bullied at school. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.023 3. Bogart, L. M., Elliott, M. N., Klein, D. J., Tortolero, S. R., Mrug, S., Peskin, M. F., Davies, S. L., Schink, E. T., & Schuster, M. A. (2014). Peer victimization in fifth grade and health in tenth grade. Pediatrics, 133(3), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3510 4. Bouman, T., van der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., & Aleva, E. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50(6), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004 5. Breivik, K., Bru, E., Hancock, C., Idsøe, E. C., Idsøe, T., & Solberg, M. E. (2017). Å bli utsatt for mobbing. En kunnskapsoppsummering om konsekvenser og tiltak Læringsmiljøsenteret. https://www.uis.no/sites/default/files/inline-images/i1MahGfNe33or7v3hddN4kCmiIKUFiGoZzQ4gq6YN34YluIDVC.pdf
|
|