The Importance of Implementation Fidelity for Teacher-Related Changes Within the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program
-
Published:2023-09
Issue:3
Volume:5
Page:271-283
-
ISSN:2523-3653
-
Container-title:International Journal of Bullying Prevention
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int Journal of Bullying Prevention
Author:
Jantzer Vanessa,Ossa Fanny C.,Lerch Stefan,Resch Franz,Kaess Michael
Abstract
AbstractAlthough teachers are key figures of a program’s effectiveness, most intervention studies to date have not explored how anti-bullying programs are associated with changes at teacher level. Moreover, teacher data also informs about aspects of program implementation, which are essential in program evaluations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to gain insight into the perspectives of teachers working with the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP). A scientific evaluation of the OBPP was carried out in 21 German schools. In addition to annual student surveys, regular teacher surveys were conducted. Ordered logistic regressions and linear regressions were used to estimate the variables. As we expected a dosage-response effect, we divided the schools by level of implementation (non-completer, completer, and certified Olweus schools). At baseline, 615 teachers took part in the assessment (68.26%), and 388 teachers at postline 2 years later (47.32%). A positive change in teachers’ intention to intervene in bullying could be found across all schools (p < .001), which was only significant for completer (p < .001) and certified schools (p = .004) when differentiated by implementation level. Teachers’ level of job strain did not change at all (non-significant model fit), while an improvement in school climate only emerged for certified schools (p = .003). The moderating effect of the implementation level turned out to be independent of different school characteristics. The self-reported changes at the teacher level depended on the level of program implementation. Therefore, it is essential to record data about the intensity of program activities when evaluating a program.Trial registration number: DRKS00008202 (date of registration: 08/04/2015).
Funder
Baden-Württemberg Stiftung Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference49 articles.
1. Ahtola, A., Haataja, A., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). For children only? Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.006 2. Axford, N., Bjornstad, G., Clarkson, S., Ukoumunne, O. C., Wrigley, Z., Matthews, J., Berry, V., & Hutchings, J. (2020). The effectiveness of the KiVa bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 21, 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9 3. Bauman, S., & Hurley, C. (2005). Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about bullying. Journal of School Violence, 4(3), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v04n03_05 4. Black, S., & Washington, E. (2008). Evaluation of the Olweus bullying prevention program in nine urban schools: Effective practices and next steps. ERS Spectrum, 26(4), 7–19. 5. Bottiani, J., Duran, C., Pas, E., & Bradshaw, C. (2019). Teacher stress and burnout in urban middle schools: Associations with job demands, resources, and effective classroom practices. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.002
|
|