Using a tier classification system to evaluate the quality of bycatch estimates from fisheries

Author:

Benaka Lee R.ORCID,Chan Andrea N.ORCID,Kennelly Steven J.ORCID,Olsen Noelle A.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractBycatch continues to be a challenge to sustainable fisheries management (The term “bycatch” in this paper covers discards and does not include retained incidental catch). Bycatch estimates can inform stock status determinations by improving understanding of fishing mortality, and help managers monitor the effectiveness of regulations. Assessments of the quality of bycatch estimation programs and procedures are necessary to evaluate the precision and limitations of their results over time. NOAA Fisheries experts used a “Tier Classification System” (TCS) to compare the quality of fish bycatch data and estimation methods for U.S. commercial fisheries in 2005 and 2015. The TCS included criteria related to data adequacy and analytical approaches. A comparison of U.S. fishery tier scores demonstrated that most fisheries were classified into higher tiers in 2015 compared to 2005 due to factors including improved sampling design. In addition, this comparison identified region-specific trends (e.g., mostly improvements occurred for Alaska fisheries with more mixed results for Greater Atlantic fisheries). The improvements in bycatch data quality and estimation methods in the United States are a result of financial investments in observer programs by NOAA Fisheries and industry partners, as well as effective conservation measures implemented by regional fishery management councils and NOAA Fisheries. The TCS was also used to assess bycatch data and estimation methods in all of Australia’s fishery jurisdictions for the decade 2010–19, illustrating the international applicability of the method. Overall, Australian state fisheries scored lower than federally managed fisheries in both the United States and Australia, reflecting the fact that the latter fisheries tend to be larger (and more valuable) than those in state jurisdictions, with a larger investment in observer programs. A comparison of tier scores and estimates of discards by fishery may provide a useful input for decision-making processes regarding allocation of resources to improve bycatch monitoring.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Aquatic Science

Reference35 articles.

1. Alverson DL, Greenberg MH, Pope JG, Murawski SA (1994) A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 339. Rome, FAO

2. Benaka LR, Bullock D, Hoover AL, Olsen NA (ed) (2019) U.S. national bycatch report first edition update 3. U.S. Dept. of Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo

3. Benaka LR, Cimo LF, Jenkins LD (2012) Bycatch provisions in the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act. Mar Fish Rev 74(2):1–12

4. Brooke SG, Desfosse LL, Karp WA (2012) Estimating overall fish bycatch in U.S. commercial fisheries. Mar Fish Rev 74(3):1–5

5. Cahalan J, Faunce C, Bonney J, Swanson R (2016) A field test of fisheries observer sampling methods for estimation of at-sea discards. Fish Res 174:219–233

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessment of Quality of Fishery Resources in the Northeastern South China Sea;Journal of Marine Science and Engineering;2022-07-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3