Abstract
Abstract
Aquatic animals use and produce sound for critical life functions, including reproduction. Anthropogenic noise is recognized as a global source of environmental pollution and adequate conservation and management strategies are urgently needed. It becomes therefore critical to identify the reproductive traits that render a species vulnerable to acoustic disturbances, and the types of anthropogenic noise that are most likely to impact reproduction. Here, we provide predictions about noise impact on fish reproduction following a two-step approach: first, we grouped documented effects of noise into three mechanistic categories: stress, masking and hearing-loss, and test which type of noise (continuous vs intermittent and regular vs irregular) was most likely to produce a significant response in each category with either a meta-analysis or a quantitative review, depending on data availability. Second, we reviewed existing literature to predict which reproductive traits would render fish most sensitive to stress, masking and hearing-loss. In step one, we concluded that continuous sounds with irregular amplitude and/or frequency-content (e.g. heavy ship traffic) were most likely to cause stress, and continuous sounds were also most likely to induce masking and hearing-loss. From step two we concluded that the vulnerability of a species to noise-induced stress will mainly depend on: (1) its potential to reallocate reproduction to more quiet times or locations, and (2) its vulnerability to masking and hearing-loss mainly on the function of sound communication in its reproductive behaviour. We discuss in which stages of reproduction fish are most likely to be vulnerable to anthropogenic noise based on these findings.
Graphic abstract
Funder
Institute of Marine Research
Equinor
Science and Technology Foundation, Portugal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference187 articles.
1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281
2. Alves D, Amorim MCP, Fonseca PJ (2016) Assessing acoustic communication active space in the Lusitanian toadfish. J Exp Biol 219:1122–1129
3. Amorim MCP (2006) Diversity of sound production in fish. In: Ladich F, Collin S, Moller P et al (eds) Communication in fishes. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 71–104
4. Amorim MCP, Pedroso SS, Bolgan M et al (2013) Painted gobies sing their quality out loud: acoustic rather than visual signals advertise male quality and contribute to mating success. Funct Ecol 27:289–298
5. Amorim MCP, Vasconcelos RO, Fonseca PJ (2015) Fish sounds and mate choice. Sound communication in fishes. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–33
Cited by
64 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献