1. Bagley, S., Rasmussen, C., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Inverse composition and identity: The case of function and linear transformation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 36–47.
2. Bailey, N., Quinn, C., Reed, S. D., Wanner, C. A., McCulloch, A. W., Lovett, J. N., & Sherman, M. F. (2019). Calculus II students’ understanding of the univalence requirement of function. In A. Weinberg, D. Moore-Russo, H. Soto, & M. Wawro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 18–26).
3. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 247–285.
4. Brown, A., DeVries, D. J., Dubinsky, E., & Thomas, K. (1997). Learning binary operations groups and subgroups. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(3), 187–239.
5. Carlson, M. P. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), CBMS Issues in mathematics education: Research in collegiate mathematics education III (Vol. 7, pp. 115–162). American Mathematical Society.