Abstract
AbstractThe present study aimed to investigate the blocking of stimulus control in three children with autism. We used a go/no-go procedure in a standard blocking paradigm. In Phase 1, we established one of two sounds or colored squares as a discriminative stimulus for touching a tablet screen. In Phase 2, a colored square was added to the sound or a sound was added to the colored square in a stimulus compound. The discrimination training continued as in Phase 1. We subsequently tested discriminative control by each of the single stimuli separately and by the compounds. Finally, after testing with no programmed consequences, we reestablished the original discrimination and replicated the test of stimulus control. The results support previous experiments by demonstrating that the establishment of discriminative control by a second stimulus by adding it to a previously established discriminative stimulus in a compound was blocked by the earlier discrimination training in all three participants. We discuss procedural details that may be critical to avoid the blocking of stimulus control in the applied field, particularly with respect to the acquisition of skills that involve multiple stimuli, such as joint attention, social referencing, and bidirectional naming.
Funder
Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference56 articles.
1. Arcediano, F., Matute, H., & Miller, R. R. (1997). Blocking of Pavlovian conditioning in humans. Learning & Motivation, 28, 188–199, Article LM960957. https://doi.org/10.1006/lmot.1996.0957.
2. Bergen, A. E. (2002). Blocking of stimulus control over human operant behavior (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1993/19578. Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
3. Blaisdell, A. P., Gunther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1999). Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199432.
4. Cengher, M., Budd, A., Farrell, N., & Fienup, D. M. (2018). A review of prompt-fading procedures: Implications for effective and efficient skill cquisition. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 30(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9575-8.
5. Cheatle, M. D., & Rudy, J. W. (1978). Analysis of second-order odor-aversion conditioning in neonatal rats: Implications for Kamin’s blocking effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.4.3.237.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献