Abstract
AbstractDubins and Savage (How to gamble if you must: inequalities for stochastic processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965) found an optimal strategy for limsup gambling problems in which a player has at most two choices at every state x at most one of which could differ from the point mass $$\delta (x)$$
δ
(
x
)
. Their result is extended here to a family of two-person, zero-sum stochastic games in which each player is similarly restricted. For these games we show that player 1 always has a pure optimal stationary strategy and that player 2 has a pure $$\epsilon $$
ϵ
-optimal stationary strategy for every $$\epsilon > 0$$
ϵ
>
0
. However, player 2 has no optimal strategy in general. A generalization to n-person games is formulated and $$\epsilon $$
ϵ
-equilibria are constructed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Mathematics (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability
Reference20 articles.
1. Chow YS, Robbins H, Siegmund D (1971) Great expectations: the theory of optimal stopping. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
2. Dubins L, Savage L (1965) How to gamble if you must: inequalities for stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York (Dover editions in 1976 and 2014)
3. Dubins L, Sudderth W (1977a) On countably additive gambling and optimal stopping theory. Z f Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie 41:5972
4. Dubins L, Sudderth W (1977b) Persistently $$\epsilon $$-optimal strategies. Math Oper Res 2:125–134
5. Dynkin E (1969) Game variant of a problem of optimal stopping. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 10:270–274