Abstract
AbstractIn the last decades, scientific laws and concepts have been increasingly conceptualized as a patchwork of contextual and indeterminate entities. These patchwork constructions are sometimes claimed to be incompatible with traditional views of scientific theories and concepts, but it is difficult to assess such claims due to the informal character of these approaches. In this paper, we will show that patchwork approaches pose a new problem of theoretical terms. Specifically, we will demonstrate how a toy example of a patchwork structure might trivialize Carnap’s semantics for theoretical terms based upon epsilon calculus. However, as we will see, this new problem of theoretical terms can be given a neo-Carnapian solution, by generalizing Carnap’s account of theoretical terms in such a way that it applies also to patchwork constructions. Our neo-Carnapian approach to theoretical terms will also demonstrate that the analytic/synthetic distinction is meaningful even for patchwork structures.
Funder
Scuola IMT Alti Studi Lucca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Andreas, H. (2014). Carnapian Structuralism. Erkenntnis, 79, 1373–1391.
2. Andreas, H. (2018). Modular Semantics for Theories: An Approach to Paraconsistent Reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(5), 877–912.
3. Andreas, H. (2021). Theoretical Terms in Science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/theoretical-terms-science/.
4. Andreas, H., & Schiemer, G. (2016). A Choice-Semantical Approach to Theoretical Truth. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 58, 1–8.
5. Avigad, J., & Zach, R. (2020). The Epsilon Calculus. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2020.