Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference6 articles.
1. Yu J, Yang S, Wang Y, Li J, Su T, Chang J, Chen G. The balloon catheter method and the end-hole catheter method in the measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient: a comparative study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024;1:1–7.
2. Maleux G, Willems E, Fieuws S, Heye S, Vaninbroukx J, Laleman W, Cassiman D, Verslype C, Nevens F. Prospective study comparing different methods to measure portal pressure. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1553–8.
3. Smith T, Kim C, Smith A, janas , Miller , Sopko , Suhocki . GMDP. Hepatic venous pressure measurements: comparison of end-hole and balloon catheter methods. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:219–26.
4. Maleux G, Nevens F, Heye S, Verslype C, Marchal G. The use of carbon dioxide wedged hepatic venography to identify the portal vein: comparison with direct catheter portography with iodinated contrast medium and analysis of predictive factors influencing level of opacification. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1771–9.
5. Ma J, Gong X, Luo J, Gu J, Yan Z, Zhang W, Li C, Zhang Z, Yang M. Impact of intrahepatic venovenous shunt on hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:2081–8.