Intended or new parenthood? The child’s best interest: Italy and the European Court of Human Rights

Author:

Nardocci Costanza

Abstract

AbstractThe article investigates domestic and supranational responses towards new forms of parenthood in the light of the child’s best interest. Examining the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Italian Courts on artificial reproductive technologies and surrogacy agreements, this article contends that the European Court of Human Rights did not abandon the ideal type of families based on biological bonds despite efforts to ensure the paramount relevance of children’s rights. Interlacing the Italian case and the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments against Italy, this article argues that persists a long way before the full recognition of forms of parenthood lacking genetic links, despite the willingness to safeguard the legal status of the child.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Milano

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference16 articles.

1. Blauwhoff, R., Frohn, L.: International commercial surrogacy arrangements: the interests of the child as a concern of both human rights and private international law. In: Paulussen, C., et al. (eds.) Fundamental Rights in International and European Law. T.M.C Asser Press (2016)

2. Bracken, L.: Cross-border surrogacy before the European court of Human Rights: analysis of Valdís fjÖlnisdóttir and others v Iceland. Eur. J. Health Law 29(2), 194–216 (2021)

3. Crivelli, E.: The Italian debate about the ratification of protocol n. 16, Eurojus (2020)

4. D’Amico, M.E.: Lo spazio giudiziario europeo e la tutela complessa dei diritti. Italian Review of Legal History (2017)

5. Ergas, Y.: Babies without borders: human rights, human dignity, and the regulation of international commercial surrogacy. Emory Int’l L. Rev. 27, Article ID 117 (2013). https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol27/iss1/5

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3