Practice makes perfect: Practice engagement theory and the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency

Author:

Reder StephenORCID,Gauly BrittaORCID,Lechner ClemensORCID

Abstract

AbstractPractice engagement theory (PET) posits that individuals’ literacy proficiencies develop as a by-product of their engagement in everyday reading and writing practices and, reciprocally, that literacy proficiencies affect levels of engagement in reading and writing practices. This suggests that literacy training which increases engagement in meaningful practices might generate proficiency growth. Research has shown that this approach does indeed seem to be effective in improving (adult) learners’ literacy proficiency. A number of cross-sectional comparisons of participants’ and non-participants’ performance in various training activities, as well as quantitative modelling of adults’ proficiency growth in longitudinal studies have confirmed the theoretical assumptions of PET. The authors of this article describe the first application of PET to literacy and numeracy development in a longitudinal study of a nationally representative adult population. Their investigation followed a sample of adults initially interviewed and assessed in the German component of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), adding longitudinal data from three additional waves of the national extension study (PIAAC-L), which included repeated assessments of literacy and numeracy proficiency over a period of three years. The authors’ quantitative modelling of the growth of literacy and numeracy proficiency over time provides strong support for PET. Their comparisons of how various practice engagement indexes predict growth of literacy and numeracy proficiencies indicate that reading engagement is the strongest predictor of literacy growth and maths engagement is the strongest predictor of numeracy growth. The authors conclude their article by considering their findings’ implications for sustainable development, lifelong learning policy and future research into the development of adult literacy and numeracy proficiency.

Funder

German Research Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference43 articles.

1. Avvisati, F., & Keslair, F. (2017 [2014]). REPEST: Stata module to run estimations with weighted replicate samples and plausible values [revised 23 Mar 2017]. Statistical Software Components S457918. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Department of Economics.

2. Barrett, G., & Riddell, W. (2016). Ageing and literacy skills: Evidence from IALS, ALL and PIAAC. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 145. EDU/WKP(2016)19. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 2 January 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlphd2twps1-en.

3. Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324.

4. Brooks, G., Davies, R., Ducke, L., Hutchison, D., Kendall, S., & Wilkin, A. (2001). Progress in adult literacy: Do learners learn?. London: The Basic Skills Agency.

5. Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (1998). Use it or lose it? The impact of time out of work on literacy and numeracy skills. London: Basic Skills Agency. Retrieved 2 January 2019 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED430160.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3