Abstract
AbstractDespite significant progress in the legalization and decriminalization of abortion in Australia over the past decade or more recent research and government reports have made it clear that problems with the provision of services remain. This essay examines such issues and sets forth the view that such issues can and should be seen as (bio)ethical concerns. Whilst conscientious objection—the right to opt-out of provision on the basis of clear ethical reservations—is a legally and morally permissible stance that healthcare professionals can adopt, this does not mean those working in healthcare can simply elect not to be providers absent a clear ethical rationale. Furthermore, simple non-provision would seem to contravene the basic tenants of medical professionalism as well as the oft raised claims of the healthcare professions to put the needs of patients first. Recognizing that much of the progress that has been made over the past three decades can be attributed to the efforts of dedicated healthcare professionals who have dedicated their careers to meeting the profession’s collective responsibilities in this area of women’s health and reproductive healthcare, this paper frames the matter as a collective ethical lapse on the part of healthcare professionals, the healthcare professions and those involved in the management of healthcare institutions. Whilst also acknowledging that a range of complex factors have led to the present situation, that a variety of steps need to be taken to ensure the proper delivery of services that are comprehensive, and that there has been an absence of critical commentary and analysis of this topic by bioethicists, I conclude that there is a need to (re)assess the provision of abortion in Australia at all levels of service delivery and for the healthcare professions and healthcare professionals to take lead in doing so. That this ought to be done is clearly implied by the healthcare profession’s longstanding commitment to prioritizing the needs of patient over their own interests.
Funder
Australian National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Aiken, Ara, Pa. Lohr, J. Lord, N. Ghosh, and J. Starling. 2021. Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of No-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: A national cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 128 (9): 1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16668.
2. AMA. 2015. ‘Position statement on medical professionalism’. Australian Medical Association. https://www.ama.com.au/position-statement/medical-professionalism-2010-revised-2015
3. Australian Associated. 2023. Press. ‘Medical abortion pill to become easier to access across Australia as restrictions scrapped’. The Guardian, 10 July 2023, sec. Australia news. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/11/medical-abortion-pill-ms-2-step-ru486-limits-scrapped-australia
4. Baird, Barbara. 2015. Medical abortion in Australia: A short history. Reproductive Health Matters 23(46): 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.10.002
5. Baird, Barbara. 2023. Abortion care is health care. Australia: Melbourne University Publishing.