The provision of abortion in Australia: service delivery as a bioethical concern

Author:

Emmerich NathanORCID

Abstract

AbstractDespite significant progress in the legalization and decriminalization of abortion in Australia over the past decade or more recent research and government reports have made it clear that problems with the provision of services remain. This essay examines such issues and sets forth the view that such issues can and should be seen as (bio)ethical concerns. Whilst conscientious objection—the right to opt-out of provision on the basis of clear ethical reservations—is a legally and morally permissible stance that healthcare professionals can adopt, this does not mean those working in healthcare can simply elect not to be providers absent a clear ethical rationale. Furthermore, simple non-provision would seem to contravene the basic tenants of medical professionalism as well as the oft raised claims of the healthcare professions to put the needs of patients first. Recognizing that much of the progress that has been made over the past three decades can be attributed to the efforts of dedicated healthcare professionals who have dedicated their careers to meeting the profession’s collective responsibilities in this area of women’s health and reproductive healthcare, this paper frames the matter as a collective ethical lapse on the part of healthcare professionals, the healthcare professions and those involved in the management of healthcare institutions. Whilst also acknowledging that a range of complex factors have led to the present situation, that a variety of steps need to be taken to ensure the proper delivery of services that are comprehensive, and that there has been an absence of critical commentary and analysis of this topic by bioethicists, I conclude that there is a need to (re)assess the provision of abortion in Australia at all levels of service delivery and for the healthcare professions and healthcare professionals to take lead in doing so. That this ought to be done is clearly implied by the healthcare profession’s longstanding commitment to prioritizing the needs of patient over their own interests.

Funder

Australian National University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Aiken, Ara, Pa. Lohr, J. Lord, N. Ghosh, and J. Starling. 2021. Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of No-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: A national cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 128 (9): 1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16668.

2. AMA. 2015. ‘Position statement on medical professionalism’. Australian Medical Association. https://www.ama.com.au/position-statement/medical-professionalism-2010-revised-2015

3. Australian Associated. 2023. Press. ‘Medical abortion pill to become easier to access across Australia as restrictions scrapped’. The Guardian, 10 July 2023, sec. Australia news. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/11/medical-abortion-pill-ms-2-step-ru486-limits-scrapped-australia

4. Baird, Barbara. 2015. Medical abortion in Australia: A short history. Reproductive Health Matters 23(46): 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.10.002

5. Baird, Barbara. 2023. Abortion care is health care. Australia: Melbourne University Publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3