Abstract
AbstractCrowdsourcing holds great potential: macro-task crowdsourcing can, for example, contribute to work addressing climate change. Macro-task crowdsourcing aims to use the wisdom of a crowd to tackle non-trivial tasks such as wicked problems. However, macro-task crowdsourcing is labor-intensive and complex to facilitate, which limits its efficiency, effectiveness, and use. Technological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) might overcome these limits by supporting the facilitation of crowdsourcing. However, AI’s potential for macro-task crowdsourcing facilitation needs to be better understood for this to happen. Here, we turn to affordance theory to develop this understanding. Affordances help us describe action possibilities that characterize the relationship between the facilitator and AI, within macro-task crowdsourcing. We follow a two-stage, bottom-up approach: The initial development stage is based on a structured analysis of academic literature. The subsequent validation & refinement stage includes two observed macro-task crowdsourcing initiatives and six expert interviews. From our analysis, we derive seven AI affordances that support 17 facilitation activities in macro-task crowdsourcing. We also identify specific manifestations that illustrate the affordances. Our findings increase the scholarly understanding of macro-task crowdsourcing and advance the discourse on facilitation. Further, they help practitioners identify potential ways to integrate AI into crowdsourcing facilitation. These results could improve the efficiency of facilitation activities and the effectiveness of macro-task crowdsourcing.
Funder
Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Decision Sciences
Reference180 articles.
1. Abhinav K, Dubey A, Jain S, Bhatia GK, McCartin B, Bhardwaj N (2018) “Crowdassistant: a virtual buddy for crowd worker,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Crowd Sourcing in Software Engineering, pp. 17–20 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3195863.3195865)
2. Achmat L, Brown I (2019) “Artificial intelligence affordances for business innovation: a systematic review of literature,” in Proceedings of 4th International Conference on the Internet, Cyber Security and Information Systems, pp. 1–12
3. Adla A, Zarate P, Soubie J-L (2011) A proposal of toolkit for GDSS facilitators. Group Decis Negot 20(1):57–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9204-8)
4. Alabduljabbar R, Al-Dossari H (2016) “A Task Ontology-based Model for Quality Control in Crowdsourcing Systems,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems, pp. 22–28 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2987386.2987413)
5. Alford J, Head BW (2017) Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society 36(3):397–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献