Considerations for Embedding Inclusive Research Principles in the Design and Execution of Clinical Trials

Author:

Peters UbongORCID,Turner Brenna,Alvarez Daniel,Murray Makaelah,Sharma Aruna,Mohan Shalini,Patel Shilpen

Abstract

AbstractThere is a growing recognition that the clinical research enterprise has a diversity problem, given that many clinical trials recruit historically marginalized individuals or patients reflective of real-world data at a rate that is far below the incidence and prevalence of the disease for which the investigational therapy or device is targeting. This lack of diversity in clinical research participation can obscure the safety and efficacy of drug therapies and limits our collective ability to develop effective treatments for all patients, leading to even wider health disparities. This review article provides an in-depth analysis of the impact of this bias on public health, along with a description of some of the barriers that prevent historically marginalized populations from participating in clinical research. Some practical solutions that can be employed to increase diversity in clinical trial participation are also discussed, including the crucial role clinical trial sponsors, research organizations, patients, and caregivers need to play in supporting the industry to achieve this ambitious but necessary goal.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Reference54 articles.

1. Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):5–8.

2. Rubin E. Striving for diversity in research studies. N Engl J Med. 2021; 1429–1430.

3. Drain PK, Parker RA, Robine M, et al. Global migration of clinical research during the era of trial registration. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192413.

4. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf.

5. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global comparative assessments in the health sector: disease burden, health expenditures, and intervention packages. In: Bryant JH, Harrison PF, Institute of Medicine (US) Board on International Health, editors. Global health in transition: a synthesis: perspectives from international organizations. Washington: National Academies Press; 1996.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3