Visit Experience and Fulfillment of Care Needs in Primary Care Differs for Video Visits Compared to In-person and Chat Visits

Author:

Söderberg DanielORCID,Bonn Stephanie E.,Sjöblom Linnea,Dahlgren Anna,Muli Irene,Amer-Wåhlin Isis,Bertilson Bo C.,Farrokhnia Nasim,Hvitfeldt Helena,Taloyan Marina,Hägglund Maria,Trolle Lagerros Ylva

Abstract

Abstract Background There is a lack of research comparing patient experience and to what extent patients’ care needs are fulfilled in telemedicine compared to in-person care. Objective To investigate if patient experience and fulfillment of care needs differ between video and chat visits with direct to consumer telemedicine providers compared to in-person visits. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants Adults visiting a primary care physician in person or via chat or video in Region Stockholm, Sweden, October 2020–May 2021. Main Measures Patient-reported visit experience and fulfillment of care needs. Key Results The sample included 3315 patients who had an in-person (1950), video (844), or chat (521) visit. Response rates were 42% for in-person visitors and 41% for telemedicine visitors. Patients were 18–97 years old, mean age of 51 years, and 66% were female. In-person visitors reported the most positive patient experience (“To a very high degree” or “Yes, completely”) for being listened to (64%), being treated with care (64%), and feeling trust and confidence in the health care professional (76%). Chat visitors reported the most positive patient experience for being given enough time (61%) and having care needs fulfilled during the care visit (76%). Video visitors had the largest proportion of respondents choosing “To a very low degree” or “No, not at all” for all visit experience measures. There were statistically significant differences in the distribution of visit experiences between in-person, video, and chat visits for all visit experience measures (P < 0.001). Conclusions Video visits were associated with a more negative visit experience and lower fulfillment of care needs than in-person visits. Chat visits were associated with a similar patient experience and fulfillment of care needs as in-person visits. Chat visits may be a viable alternative to in-person visits for selected patients.

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

AFA Försäkring

Stockholms Läns Landsting

Karolinska Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3