Abstract
AbstractBackgroundInappropriate hospital admissions compromise the efficiency of the health care system. This work analyzes, for the first time, the prevalence of inappropriate admission and its association with clinical and epidemiological patient characteristics.ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence, associated risk factors, and economic impact of inappropriate hospital admissions.Design and ParticipantsThis was a cross-sectional observational study of all hospitalized patients in a high complexity hospital of over 901 beds capacity in Spain. The prevalence of inappropriate admission and its causes, the association of inappropriateness with patients’ intrinsic risk factors (IRFs), and associated financial costs were analyzed with theAppropriateness Evaluation Protocolin a multivariate model.Main Measures and Key ResultsA total of 593 patients were analyzed, and a prevalence of inappropriate admissions of 11.9% (95% CI: 9.5 to 14.9) was found. The highest number of IRFs for developing health care-related complications was associated with inappropriateness, which was more common among patients with 1 IRF (OR [95% CI]: 9.68 [3.6 to 26.2.] versus absence of IRFs) and among those with surgical admissions (OR [95% CI]: 1.89 [1.1 to 3.3] versus medical admissions). The prognosis of terminal disease reduced the risk (OR [95% CI]: 0.28 [0.1 to 0.9] versus a prognosis of full recovery based on baseline condition). Inappropriate admissions were responsible for 559 days of avoidable hospitalization, equivalent to €17,604.6 daily and €139,076.4 in total, mostly attributable to inappropriate emergency admissions (€96,805.3).ConclusionsThe prevalence of inappropriate admissions is similar to the incidence found in previous studies and is a useful indicator in monitoring this kind of overuse. Patients with a moderate number of comorbidities were subject to a higher level of inappropriateness. Inappropriate admission had a substantial and avoidable financial impact.
Funder
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Hopkins A, Fitzpatrick R, Foster A, et al. What do we mean by appropriate health care? Report of a working group prepared for the Director of Research and Development of the NHS Management Executive. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 1993;2:117–23.
2. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5.
3. Lavis JN, Anderson GM. Appropriateness in health care delivery: definitions, measurement and policy implications. CMAJ. 1996;154:321–8.
4. Peiró S, Meneu R. Revisión de la utilización. Definición, Concepto y Métodos. Rev Calidad Asistencial 1997;12: 122-136.
5. Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US Health care system: estimated costs and potential for savings. JAMA. 2019;322:1501–9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献