Abstract
Abstract
Background
Female sexual dysfunction (FSD), defined as clinically distressing problems with desire, arousal, orgasm, or pain, affects 12% of US women. Despite availability of medications for FSD, primary care physicians (PCPs) report feeling underprepared to manage it. In contrast, erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently treated in primary care.
Objective
To describe differences in patterns of FSD and ED diagnosis and management in primary care patients.
Design
Retrospective observational study.
Subjects
Primary care patients with an incident diagnosis of FSD or ED seen at a large, integrated health system between 2016 and 2022.
Main Measures
Sexual dysfunction management (referral or prescription of a guideline-concordant medication within 3 days of diagnosis), patient characteristics (age, race, insurance type, marital status), and specialty of physician who diagnosed sexual dysfunction. We estimated the odds of FSD and ED management using mixed effects logistic regression in separate models.
Key Results
The sample included 6540 female patients newly diagnosed with FSD and 16,591 male patients newly diagnosed with ED. Twenty-two percent of FSD diagnoses were made by PCPs, and 38% by OB/GYNs. Forty percent of ED diagnoses were made by PCPs and 20% by urologists. Patients with FSD were managed less frequently (33%) than ED patients (41%). The majority of FSD and ED patients who were managed received a medication (96% and 97%, respectively). In the multivariable models, compared to diagnosis by a specialist, diagnosis by a PCP was associated with lower odds of management for FSD patients (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51–0.69) and higher odds of management (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36–1.64) for ED patients.
Conclusions
Primary care patients with FSD are less likely to receive management if they are diagnosed by a PCP than by an OB/GYN. The opposite was true of ED patients, exposing a gap in the quality of care female patients receive.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC