Qualitative relationism about subject and object of perception and experience

Author:

Pace Giannotta AndreaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, I compare various theories of perception in relation to the question of the epistemological and ontological status of the qualities that appear in perceptual experience. I group these theories into two main views: quality externalism and quality internalism, and I highlight their contrasting problems in accounting for phenomena such as perceptual relativity, illusions and hallucinations (the “problem of perception”). Then, I propose an alternative view, which I callqualitative relationismand which conceives of the subject and the object of perceptual experience as essentially related to one another (hencerelationism) in a process of co-constitution out of fundamental qualities (hencequalitativerelationism). I lend support to this view by drawing on Husserl’s genetic phenomenology, which I complement with a form of neutral monism. I argue that the investigation of the temporal structure of perceptual experience leads us to find at its heart a qualitative process that is more fundamental than the two relata of perception and that gives rise to them. Then, I extend this account of perception into a general theory of intentionality and experience and I develop its implications into a neutral monist metaphysics.

Funder

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

Österreichische Austauschdienst

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Philosophy

Reference60 articles.

1. Banks, E. C. (2003). Ernst Mach’s world elements. A study in natural philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.

2. Banks, E. C. (2010). Neutral monism reconsidered. Philosophical Psychology, 23(2), 173–187.

3. Bernet, R. (1994). An intentionality without subject or object? Man and World, 27(3), 231–255.

4. Bitbol, M. (2012). Neurophenomenology, an ongoing practice of/in consciousness. Constructivist Foundations, 7(3), 165–173.

5. Bitbol, M., & Antonova, E. (2016). On the too often overlooked radicality of neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations, 11(2), 354–356.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3