Author:
Moore James W.,Radley Keith C.,Dart Evan H.,Whipple Heather M.,Ness Emily J.,Murphy Ashley N.,Furlow Chris,Wimberly Joy K.,Smith Ashley
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforce preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.
2. DeLeon, I. G., Chase, J. A., Frank-Crawford, M. A., Carreau-Webster, A. B., Bullock, C. E., & Jennett, H. K. (2014). Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 1–21.
3. DeLeon, I. G., Frank, M. A., Gregory, M. K., & Allman, M. J. (2009). On the correspondence between preference assessment outcomes and progressive-ratio schedule assessments of stimulus value. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 729–733.
4. DeRosa, N. M., & Roane, H. S. (2015). Preference and demand characteristics of reinforcement: practical extensions. In F. D. DiGennaro Reed & D. D. Reed (Eds.), Autism service delivery: bridging the gap between science and practice. New York, NY: Springer.
5. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforce identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15–25.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献