Author:
de Lima Bruna Coelho,dos Santos Carlos H.,Tiritan Carlos S.,Demattê José A. M.,Gomez Andres M. R.,Albarracín Heidy S. R.,A. Bartsch Bruno
Abstract
AbstractThis work aimed to develop suitable predictive models for ammonium, nitrate, total nitrogen, total organic carbon and soil humic fractions, for Ferralsols, using Vis-NIR-SWIR, MIR and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopic techniques in conjunction with machine learning algorithms, Cubist, PLSR, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine. Chemical analyzes were carried out to determine nitrate, total nitrogen, total organic carbon and chemical fractionation of soil organic matter, as well as spectral analyzes using Vis-NIR-SWIR spectroscopy, MIR and X-ray fluorescence. The spectroscopy results were processed using RStudio v. 4.1.3, applying Cusbist, PLSR, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine machine learning algorithms to create predictive models and describe spectral curves and Pearson correlation. Of the prediction models developed for nitrogen, total organic carbon and humic fractions, the PLSR and Support Vector Machine algorithms presented the best predictive performances. The descriptive analysis of the spectra identified the main absorption bands and the location of the bands sensitive to the attributes of interest. The correlation analysis proposed that the use of Vis-NIR-SWIR, MIR and XRF spectroscopic techniques were effective in predicting the contents of nitrogen, total organic carbon and humic fractions in soil with a medium sandy texture. However, it is important to highlight that each technique has its characteristic mechanism of action, Vis-NIR-SWIR and MIR detect the element based on overtones and fundamental tones, while XRF is based on the atomic number of the elements or elemental association.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference96 articles.
1. Sales RP, Pegoraro RF, Portugal AF, et al. Organic matter fractions of an irrigated oxisol under no-till and conventional tillage in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region. Rev Caatinga. 2017;30:303–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252017v30n205rc.
2. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to soil taxonomy, 13th edition. USDA natural resources conservation service. 2022.
3. Michéli E, Schád P, Spaargaren O, et al. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication - Worldwide reference base for soil resources. 2nd ed. FAO: Roma; 2006.
4. Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araujo Filho JC, de Oliveira JB, Cunha TJF. Brazilian soil classification system. 5th ed. Brasilia: EMBRAPA; 2019.
5. Schaefer CEGR, Fabris JD, Ker JC. Minerals in the clay fraction of Brazilian Latosols (Oxisols): a review. Clay Miner. 2008;43:137–54. https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2008.043.1.11.