1. Addicott, F. T.: Stain Technology 19, 99–102 (1944).; Am. J. of Bot. 82, 520–6 (1945).— Allen, P. J., and R. Emerson: Ind. and Engng. Chem. 41, 346–65 (1949). — American Society of Testing Materials, Standards, Part 6, D 297–50 T. p. 47–82 (1952). — Anonymous. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Rubber Research Station, Salinas, California. Procedures for the analysis of rubber bearing plants and related materials. — Artschweger, E.: United States Department of Agriculture, Tech. Bull. 842, 1–33 (1943). Contribution to the morphology and anatomy of guayule (Parthenium argentatum).
2. Barron, H.: Modern Rubber Chemistry, New York: D. van Nostrand Co. 1948. — Benedict, H. M., P. M. Brooks and R. F. Puckett: Plant Physiol. 25,120–34 (1950). — Bonner, J., and B. Arreguin: Arch, of Biochem. 21, 109-24 (1949). — Buehrer, T. F., and L. Benson: University of Arizona, College of Agriculture, Tech. Bull. 108 (1945). Rubber content of native plants of the Southwestern Desert. — Burchfield, H. P.: Ind. and Engng. Chem. Analyt. Ed. 16, 424–6 (1944); 17, 806–810 (1945).
3. Davis, C. C., and J. T. Blake: The Chemistry and Technology of Rubber, New York: Reinhold Publishing Co. 1937.
4. Fanning, R. J.,and N. Bekkedahl: Analyt. Chem. 23,1653–6 (1951). — Fendler, G.: Ber. Deutsch. Pharm. Ges. 14, 208 (1904). — Fox, C. P.: Ind. and Engng. Chem. 1, 735–6 (1909).
5. Gerke, H. R., et al.: Ind. and Engng. Chem. Analyt. Ed. 11, 593–7 (1939). — Gowans, W. J., and F. E. Clark: Analyt. Chem. 24, 529–533 (1952).