Short-term primary and revision modular dual-mobility cup total hip arthroplasty outcomes in high-risk dislocation patients: a retrospective study
-
Published:2024-09-08
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1432-1068
-
Container-title:European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Author:
Ruusiala Martta, Miettinen Hannu, Kettunen Jukka, Kröger Heikki, Miettinen SimoORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Modular dual-mobility cups (MDMCs) have a lower risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary aims of our study were to analyze implant survivorship and to determine complications, especially dislocation, and revision rates of primary THAs used for hip fracture patients and for revision THAs. Secondary aims were to evaluate mortality after MDMC surgery and to find out if introduction of MDMC at our institution (Kuopio University Hospital, Finland) have decreased dislocation rate.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study consisted of 101 MDMC patients who were consecutively operated at our institution between April 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The implant survival rate, complications and mortality were evaluated with minimum of 2-year follow-up. Finnish Hospital Discharge Register was used to find out yearly dislocation rates following THA at our institution.
Results
The cumulative estimate implant survival after MDMC in the primary THA group was 97% at 2 years, and in the revision THA group, it was 90% at 2 years. Dislocation was a rare complication in the primary THA group (1.4%), while it was common in revision THA group (12.9%). The cumulative estimate for mortality after MDMC in the primary THA group was 13% at 2 years, and in the revision group, it was also 13% at 2 years. The yearly number of patients who had re-hospitalization period due to THA dislocation decreased 46% after implementation of MDMC.
Conclusion
Short-term survival and complication rates after MDMC were excellent after primary THA and moderate after revision THA. Implementation of MDMC THA for hip fracture patients seems to have effectively decrease dislocation rate during a short follow-up.
Funder
University of Eastern Finland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Cuthbert R, Wong J, Mitchell P, Kumar Jaiswal P (2019) Dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: current concepts. EFORT Open Rev 4(11):640–646. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180089 2. Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S (2018) Hip replacement. Lancet (London, England) 392(10158):1662–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X 3. Havelin LI, Fenstad AM, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Herberts P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G (2009) The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop 80(4):393–401. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670903039544 4. Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, Boulton C, Brittain R, Clark E, Dawson-Bowling S, Deere K, Esler C, Espinoza O, Goldberg A, Gregson C, Howard P, Jameson S, Jennison T, Judge A, Lawrence S, Lenguerrand E, McCormack V, Newell C, Pegg D, Young E (2021) The National Joint Registry 18th annual report 2021. National Joint Registry. Accessed 24 March 2024 5. W-Dahl A, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Mohaddes M, Carling M, Sundberg M et al. (2022) Swedish hip arthroplasty register annual report 2022. https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/sar/r/SAR-Annual-Report-2022_EN-HkgQE89Nus.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2024
|
|