1. Allen, R. J. (1994), ‘Factual Ambiguity and a Theory of Evidence’, Northwestern University Law Review 88 (1994), 604–640.
2. Allen, R.J., and M.S. Pardo (2007), ‘The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence’. Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2007), 107–138.
3. Åqvist, L. (1990), ‘Logical Analysis of Epistemic Modality, an Explication of the Bolding-Ekelöf Degrees of Evidential Strength’, in H. T. Klami (ed.), Rätt och Sanning (Law and Truth. A symposium on legal proof-theory in Uppsala, May 1989). Uppsala, Iustus Förlag, 1990, pp. 43–54.
4. Åqvist, L. (1992), ‘Towards a Logical Theory of Legal Evidence: Semantic Analysis of the Bolding-Ekelöf Degrees of Evidential Strength’, in A.A. Martino (ed.), Expert Systems in Law, Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992, pp. 67–86.
5. Åqvist, L. (2007), ‘An Interpretation of Probability in the Law of Evidence Based on Pro-et-Contra Argumentation’, Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2007), 391–410.