Abstract
AbstractFor a period of several years the philosopher of science Hasok Chang has promoted various inter-related views including pluralism, pragmatism, and an associated view of natural kinds. He has also argued for what he calls the persistence of everyday terms in the scientific view. Chang claims that terms like phlogiston were never truly abandoned but became transformed into different concepts that remain useful. On the other hand, Chang argues that some scientific terms such as acidity have suffered a form of “rupture”, especially in the case of the modern Lewis definition of acids. Chang also complains that the degree of acidity of a Lewis acid cannot be measured using a pH meter and seems to regard this as a serious problem. The present paper examines some of these views, especially what Chang claims to be a rupture in the definition of acidity. It is suggested that there has been no such rupture but a genuine generalization, on moving from the Brønsted-Lowry theory to the Lewis theory of acidity. It will be shown how the quantification and measurement of Lewis acidity can easily be realized through the use of equilibrium theory and the use of stability constants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History,Biochemistry,General Chemistry
Reference23 articles.
1. Atkins, P.W.A., de Paula, J., Keeler, J.: Physical chemistry, 11th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)
2. Bates R.G.: Determination of pH :Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. New York, Wiley.
3. Brock, W.H.: The Norton history of chemistry. W.W. Norton & Co., New York (1993)
4. Brønsted J. N.: Recueil des travaux chimiques des Pays-Bas, 42,718-728 (1923)
5. Chang, H.: The persistence of epistemic objects through scientific change. Erkenntnis 75, 413–429 (2011)
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献