Abstract
AbstractBiochemical methane potential (BMP) tests are the most reliable method for the direct evaluation of the methane yield from a specific feedstock in anaerobic digestion. However, these tests are time-consuming (about 1 month) and quite expensive (need of no less than two or three replicates). This study evaluates the accuracy of the “first-order kinetic”, “logistic” and “Gompertz” models in predicting the BMP values, calibrating the models’ parameters with the data collected in shorter BMP tests (i.e., 5, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days) than usually (28 days or more). Moreover, the influence of the number of replicates (i.e., two or three) on the model prediction accuracy was also evaluated. A database from 32 BMP tests, previously carried out on different substrates, was adopted for these evaluations. The test duration significantly influences the prediction accuracy for two models (Gompertz and first-order kinetic), while the number of replicates is less influencing. The ultimate methane production is not accurate if the models use parameters from short (less than 10 days) BMP tests. The increase in test duration to 21 days gives BMP predictions with errors below 10% for Gompertz and logistic models.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Waste Management and Disposal,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Environmental Engineering
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献